FESC vs SCDV

FESC vs SCDV

Which is better, FESC or SCDV?

FESC costs less.

FESC has a lower expense ratio. FESC is less concentrated, with 10.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%.

Lower Fees: FESCLess Concentrated: FESC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFESCSCDV
Expense Ratio0.55%Best0.70%
AUM$5M$148M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.43%
Holdings18440
YTD Return-9.73%+6.54%Best
1Y Return-+3.53%
Top 10 Weight10.4%Best48.0%
Fund FamilyFirst Eagle InvestmentsBahl & Gaynor
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap BlendSmall Cap Blend
InceptionJun 30, 2026Dec 11, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FESC vs SCDV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare FESC against instead:FESC vs SPYFESC vs QQQFESC vs VOOFESC vs VTISCDV against:SCDV vs VXUS

FESC vs SCDV Performance

First Eagle Small Cap Equity ETF (FESC) is an ETF from First Eagle Investments and Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) is an ETF from Bahl & Gaynor. Year to date, FESC is down 9.73% versus a gain of 6.54% for SCDV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FESC charges 0.55% per year while SCDV charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $70 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FESC currently yields 0.00% against 0.43% for SCDV.

Holdings Overlap

FESC already in SCDV1.9%
SCDV already in FESC18.0%

1.9% of FESC's money is in holdings SCDV also owns. 18.0% of SCDV's money is in holdings FESC also owns.

SCDV and FESC share little of their money.

4 positions in common, counted across the 181 positions we hold weights for in FESC and 36 in SCDV, against full books of 184 and 40.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 31 positions for SCDV that do not appear in our book for FESC (78.1% of the fund), and 170 for FESC that do not appear in SCDV (93.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FESCWeight in SCDVDifference
ENSGEnsign Group Inc/the0.33%8.35%8.02%
SIMOSilicon Motion Technology Corp., ADR0.45%4.61%4.16%
NPOEnpro Industries Inc0.55%4.46%3.91%
IBPInstalled Building Products0.58%0.61%0.03%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FESC and SCDV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FESCSCDV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FESC or SCDV?

FESC has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SCDV charges 0.70%. FESC is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FESC and SCDV?

18.0% of SCDV's money is in holdings FESC also owns. 18.0% of SCDV's is in holdings FESC also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 181 positions we hold weights for in FESC and 36 in SCDV.

Which pays a higher dividend, FESC or SCDV?

FESC yields 0.00% while SCDV yields 0.43%, so SCDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SCDV better than FESC?

FESC has a lower expense ratio. FESC is less concentrated, with 10.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.