FFTI vs NFLT
FormulaFolios Tactical Income ETF vs Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF
Which is better, FFTI or NFLT?
Each has led over a different period.
NFLT has a lower expense ratio. FFTI led over 1Y, NFLT over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFTI | NFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $69M | $514M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.40% | 5.54% |
| Holdings | 5 | 1,105 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.0%Best | 6.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.5%Best | -18.3% |
| $10,000 over 7.4 years | $9,465 | $10,584Best |
| Fund Family | FormulaFolio Funds | Virtus Investment Partners |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | Diversified Sectoral Bond | Diversified Sectoral Bond |
| Inception | Jun 6, 2017 | Aug 10, 2015 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 712 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. FFTI has data through Nov 1, 2024 and NFLT through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 7.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 6, 2017 to Nov 1, 2024 (7.4 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NFLT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.2% compared with 6.0% for FFTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.5% for FFTI and -18.3% for NFLT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFTI charges 0.96% per year while NFLT charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $50 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFTI currently yields 2.40% against 5.54% for NFLT.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FFTI and NFLT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFTI or NFLT?
FFTI has an expense ratio of 0.96% while NFLT charges 0.50%. NFLT is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, FFTI or NFLT?
NFLT has been the more volatile fund at 6.2% annualized versus 6.0% for FFTI. Worst drawdown: FFTI -17.5% vs NFLT -18.3%.
Should I hold both FFTI and NFLT?
FFTI and NFLT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFTI or NFLT?
FFTI yields 2.40% while NFLT yields 5.54%, so NFLT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NFLT better than FFTI?
NFLT has a lower expense ratio. FFTI led over 1Y, NFLT over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.