FLCV vs TALV
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF vs Transamerica Large Value Active ETF
Which is better, FLCV or TALV?
FLCV costs less.
FLCV has a lower expense ratio. FLCV is less concentrated, with 31.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLCV | TALV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $211M | $178M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.72% | 0.73% |
| Holdings | 252 | 70 |
| YTD Return | +18.52%Best | +14.25% |
| 1Y Return | +23.69% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.0%Best | 33.5% |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | Transamerica |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | Dec 15, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FLCV vs TALV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FLCV vs TALV Performance
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) is an ETF from Federated Hermes and Transamerica Large Value Active ETF (TALV) is an ETF from Transamerica. Year to date, FLCV is up 18.52% versus a gain of 14.25% for TALV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLCV charges 0.32% per year while TALV charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $49 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLCV currently yields 0.72% against 0.73% for TALV.
Holdings Overlap
40.4% of FLCV's money is in holdings TALV also owns. 50.2% of TALV's money is in holdings FLCV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
26 positions in common, counted across the 126 positions we hold weights for in FLCV and 68 in TALV, against full books of 252 and 70.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 126 and 68 positions we hold weights for.
FLCV holds 100 positions TALV does not, 59.7% of the fund.
Largest: INTU 2.07%, COST 1.91%, FI 1.83%, PRU 1.69%, AMP 1.60%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLCV | Weight in TALV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.28% | 5.22% | 1.06% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.80% | 5.51% | 0.29% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.38% | 5.28% | 0.90% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.78% | 4.00% | 2.22% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 3.01% | 2.35% | 0.66% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 1.65% | 2.97% | 1.32% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.58% | 2.16% | 0.58% |
| TRVThe Travelers Cos, Inc. | 2.01% | 1.57% | 0.44% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 1.44% | 1.92% | 0.48% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 1.25% | 1.67% | 0.42% |
50.2% of TALV is already inside FLCV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLCV or TALV?
FLCV has an expense ratio of 0.32% while TALV charges 0.49%. FLCV is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FLCV and TALV?
50.2% of TALV's money is in holdings FLCV also owns. 50.2% of TALV's is in holdings FLCV also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 126 positions we hold weights for in FLCV and 68 in TALV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLCV or TALV?
FLCV yields 0.72% while TALV yields 0.73%, so TALV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TALV better than FLCV?
FLCV has a lower expense ratio. FLCV is less concentrated, with 31.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.