FLV vs MFSV
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF vs MFS Active Value ETF
Which is better, FLV or MFSV?
FLV has been ahead.
FLV has a lower expense ratio. FLV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. FLV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLV | MFSV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42%Best | 0.44% |
| AUM | $379M | $618M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.73% | 1.41% |
| Holdings | 56 | 64 |
| YTD Return | +12.50%Best | +9.21% |
| 1Y Return | +16.84%Best | +12.64% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.33% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.83% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.2% | 9.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -11.6%Best | -12.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,510Best | $11,981 |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.6%Best | 32.9% |
| Fund Family | American Century ETFs | MFS Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 5, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 5, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
FLV vs MFSV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
FLV vs MFSV Performance
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) is an ETF from American Century ETFs and MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management. Over the past year FLV returned +16.84% while MFSV returned +12.64%. Year to date, FLV is up 12.50% versus a gain of 9.21% for MFSV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.2% compared with 9.6% for MFSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.6% for FLV and -12.7% for MFSV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLV charges 0.42% per year while MFSV charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $44 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLV currently yields 1.73% against 1.41% for MFSV.
Holdings Overlap
33.9% of FLV's money is in holdings MFSV also owns. 34.7% of MFSV's money is in holdings FLV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 77 days apart, FLV as of Jun 30, 2026 and MFSV as of Sep 15, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
16 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in FLV and 60 in MFSV, against full books of 56 and 64.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 43 positions for MFSV that do not appear in our book for FLV (62.0% of the fund), and 32 for FLV that do not appear in MFSV (59.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLV | Weight in MFSV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.46% | 5.35% | 1.89% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.07% | 5.28% | 2.21% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.25% | 4.50% | 1.25% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.58% | 3.09% | 0.51% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 3.54% | 1.95% | 1.59% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 3.28% | 1.66% | 1.62% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.22% | 2.29% | 0.07% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 2.25% | 1.88% | 0.37% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 1.31% | 2.20% | 0.89% |
| KMBKimberly-Clark Corp. | 2.45% | 0.91% | 1.54% |
34.7% of MFSV is already inside FLV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLV or MFSV?
FLV has an expense ratio of 0.42% while MFSV charges 0.44%. FLV is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLV or MFSV?
Over the past year FLV returned +16.84% vs +12.64% for MFSV, so FLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FLV annualized +12.51% vs +9.98% for MFSV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLV or MFSV?
FLV has been the more volatile fund at 11.2% annualized versus 9.6% for MFSV. Worst drawdown: FLV -11.6% vs MFSV -12.7%.
Should I hold both FLV and MFSV?
FLV and MFSV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLV and MFSV?
34.7% of MFSV's money is in holdings FLV also owns. 34.7% of MFSV's is in holdings FLV also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in FLV and 60 in MFSV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLV or MFSV?
FLV yields 1.73% while MFSV yields 1.41%, so FLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MFSV better than FLV?
FLV has a lower expense ratio. FLV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. FLV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.