FRWD vs WUGI

FRWD vs WUGI

Which is better, FRWD or WUGI?

FRWD costs less.

FRWD has a lower expense ratio. FRWD is less concentrated, with 56.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.8%.

Lower Fees: FRWDLess Concentrated: FRWD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFRWDWUGI
Expense Ratio0.65%Best0.84%
AUM$274M$33M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.22%
Holdings5435
YTD Return+24.83%Best+15.77%
1Y Return--5.57%
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.18%
5Y Return (annualized)-+7.64%
Top 10 Weight56.0%Best58.8%
Fund FamilyNomura Asset Management Co LtdAXS Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJan 13, 2026Mar 31, 2020

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FRWD vs WUGI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare FRWD against instead:FRWD vs SPYFRWD vs QQQFRWD vs VOOFRWD vs VTIWUGI against:WUGI vs VXUS

FRWD vs WUGI Performance

Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD) is an ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd and AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF (WUGI) is an ETF from AXS Investments. Year to date, FRWD is up 24.83% versus a gain of 15.77% for WUGI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FRWD charges 0.65% per year while WUGI charges 0.84%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $84 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FRWD currently yields 0.00% against 0.22% for WUGI.

Holdings Overlap

FRWD already in WUGI42.5%
WUGI already in FRWD45.8%

42.5% of FRWD's money is in holdings WUGI also owns. 45.8% of WUGI's money is in holdings FRWD also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

9 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in FRWD and 31 in WUGI, against full books of 54 and 35.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 20 positions for WUGI that do not appear in our book for FRWD (51.7% of the fund), and 12 for FRWD that do not appear in WUGI (38.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FRWDWeight in WUGIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp9.32%5.78%3.54%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd6.22%8.34%2.12%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc7.60%6.12%1.48%
ASL:ASAsml Holding Nv Unsponsored Adr Ordinary Shares4.76%6.38%1.62%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.3.42%6.91%3.49%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.89%4.89%2.00%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.52%3.73%0.21%
CDNSCadence Design Systems Inc.2.04%2.63%0.59%
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies2.69%1.06%1.63%

45.8% of WUGI is already inside FRWD.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FRWDWUGI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FRWD or WUGI?

FRWD has an expense ratio of 0.65% while WUGI charges 0.84%. FRWD is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FRWD and WUGI?

45.8% of WUGI's money is in holdings FRWD also owns. 45.8% of WUGI's is in holdings FRWD also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in FRWD and 31 in WUGI.

Which pays a higher dividend, FRWD or WUGI?

FRWD yields 0.00% while WUGI yields 0.22%, so WUGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is WUGI better than FRWD?

FRWD has a lower expense ratio. FRWD is less concentrated, with 56.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.