FTCA vs IVV
Franklin California Municipal Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FTCA or IVV?
Municipal California against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTCA | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $694M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.95% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 595 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -3.66% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.34% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.3%Best | 13.2% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Municipal California | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 29, 1993 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FTCA vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FTCA vs IVV Performance
Franklin California Municipal Income ETF (FTCA) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FTCA returned -3.34% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, FTCA is down 3.66% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 6.3% for FTCA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTCA charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTCA currently yields 3.95% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 55 holdings in FTCA and 506 in IVV, totalling 29.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in FTCA and 506 in IVV, against full books of 595 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FTCA and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTCA or IVV?
FTCA has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTCA or IVV?
Over the past year FTCA returned -3.34% vs +17.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTCA or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 6.3% for FTCA.
Should I hold both FTCA and IVV?
FTCA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTCA or IVV?
FTCA yields 3.95% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FTCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FTCA?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.