FTCS vs OALC
First Trust Capital Strength ETF vs OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
Which is better, FTCS or OALC?
OALC has been ahead.
OALC has a lower expense ratio. OALC led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTCS | OALC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $7.5B | $280M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 0.52% |
| Holdings | 102 | 424 |
| YTD Return | +6.41% | +16.12%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.59% | +19.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.51% | +22.66%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.06% | +11.01%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8%Best | 15.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.9%Best | -26.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,420 | $16,858Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.5%Best | 34.0% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | OneAscent Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 6, 2006 | Nov 15, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.9 years).
FTCS vs OALC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.
FTCS vs OALC Performance
First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) is an ETF from OneAscent Investments. Over the past year FTCS returned +5.59% while OALC returned +19.96%. Year to date, FTCS is up 6.41% versus a gain of 16.12% for OALC.
Over three years, FTCS compounded at +10.51% per year against +22.66% for OALC; over five years the annualized figures are +6.06% and +11.01% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OALC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.8% for FTCS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.9% for FTCS and -26.8% for OALC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTCS charges 0.52% per year while OALC charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $49 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTCS currently yields 1.22% against 0.52% for OALC.
Holdings Overlap
66.6% of FTCS's money is in holdings OALC also owns. 14.2% of OALC's money is in holdings FTCS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
33 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 211 in OALC, against full books of 102 and 424.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 177 positions for OALC that do not appear in our book for FTCS (84.7% of the fund), and 17 for FTCS that do not appear in OALC (33.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTCS | Weight in OALC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 2.34% | 1.04% | 1.30% |
| VVisa Inc. Cl A | 2.08% | 1.25% | 0.83% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 2.17% | 1.07% | 1.10% |
| MAMastercard Inc. Cl A | 2.10% | 0.96% | 1.14% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 2.00% | 0.86% | 1.14% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.89% | 0.93% | 0.96% |
| ABNBAIRBNB INC CLASS A | 2.30% | 0.44% | 1.86% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc | 2.27% | 0.40% | 1.87% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 2.23% | 0.36% | 1.87% |
| CMECme Group, Inc | 2.22% | 0.31% | 1.91% |
66.6% of FTCS is already inside OALC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTCS or OALC?
FTCS has an expense ratio of 0.52% while OALC charges 0.49%. OALC is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTCS or OALC?
Over the past year FTCS returned +5.59% vs +19.96% for OALC, so OALC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTCS or OALC?
OALC has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.8% for FTCS. Worst drawdown: FTCS -20.9% vs OALC -26.8%.
Should I hold both FTCS and OALC?
FTCS and OALC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FTCS and OALC?
66.6% of FTCS's money is in holdings OALC also owns. 14.2% of OALC's is in holdings FTCS also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 211 in OALC.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTCS or OALC?
FTCS yields 1.22% while OALC yields 0.52%, so FTCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OALC better than FTCS?
OALC has a lower expense ratio. OALC led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.