FTMS vs IVV
Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FTMS or IVV?
Short Term Municipal Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTMS | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.21% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $218M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.10% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 264 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +0.61% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.03% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.4%Best | 13.2% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Short Term Municipal Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 18, 2013 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FTMS vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FTMS vs IVV Performance
Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF (FTMS) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FTMS returned +1.03% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, FTMS is up 0.61% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 2.4% for FTMS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTMS charges 0.21% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $21 vs $3 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTMS currently yields 3.10% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 60 holdings in FTMS and 506 in IVV, totalling 29.1% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in FTMS and 506 in IVV, against full books of 264 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FTMS and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTMS or IVV?
FTMS has an expense ratio of 0.21% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTMS or IVV?
Over the past year FTMS returned +1.03% vs +17.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTMS or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 2.4% for FTMS.
Should I hold both FTMS and IVV?
FTMS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTMS or IVV?
FTMS yields 3.10% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FTMS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FTMS?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.