GAIQ vs JGLO

GAIQ vs JGLO

Which is better, GAIQ or JGLO?

JGLO costs less.

JGLO has a lower expense ratio. GAIQ is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.4%.

Lower Fees: JGLOLess Concentrated: GAIQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGAIQJGLO
Expense Ratio0.79%0.47%Best
AUM$657,287.68$6.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.12%
Holdings30186
YTD Return-0.11%+6.16%Best
1Y Return-+8.59%
3Y Return (annualized)-+16.41%
Top 10 Weight37.1%Best41.4%
Fund FamilyGuinness Atkinson FundsJ.P. Morgan Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 12, 2026Sep 13, 2023

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

GAIQ vs JGLO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare GAIQ against instead:GAIQ vs SPYGAIQ vs QQQGAIQ vs VOOGAIQ vs VTIJGLO against:JGLO vs VXUS

GAIQ vs JGLO Performance

Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund ETF (GAIQ) is an ETF from Guinness Atkinson Funds and JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Year to date, GAIQ is down 0.11% versus a gain of 6.16% for JGLO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GAIQ charges 0.79% per year while JGLO charges 0.47%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $47 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAIQ currently yields 0.00% against 1.12% for JGLO.

Holdings Overlap

GAIQ already in JGLO43.6%
JGLO already in GAIQ38.5%

43.6% of GAIQ's money is in holdings JGLO also owns. 38.5% of JGLO's money is in holdings GAIQ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

13 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in GAIQ and 79 in JGLO, against full books of 30 and 186.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 39 positions for JGLO that do not appear in our book for GAIQ (36.1% of the fund), and 11 for GAIQ that do not appear in JGLO (37.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GAIQWeight in JGLODifference
NVDANvidia Corp3.57%8.10%4.53%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.83%6.48%2.65%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.78%4.92%1.14%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.36%4.29%0.93%
AAPLApple, Inc3.52%3.89%0.37%
MAMastercard Inc3.49%3.25%0.24%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.65%2.38%0.27%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.55%1.14%2.41%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity3.05%1.22%1.83%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd3.36%0.69%2.67%

43.6% of GAIQ is already inside JGLO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

GAIQJGLO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GAIQ or JGLO?

GAIQ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while JGLO charges 0.47%. JGLO is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between GAIQ and JGLO?

43.6% of GAIQ's money is in holdings JGLO also owns. 38.5% of JGLO's is in holdings GAIQ also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in GAIQ and 79 in JGLO.

Which pays a higher dividend, GAIQ or JGLO?

GAIQ yields 0.00% while JGLO yields 1.12%, so JGLO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JGLO better than GAIQ?

JGLO has a lower expense ratio. GAIQ is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.