GAIQ vs MOTO
Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
Which is better, GAIQ or MOTO?
MOTO costs less.
MOTO has a lower expense ratio. GAIQ is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAIQ | MOTO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.68%Best |
| AUM | $657,287.68 | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.92% |
| Holdings | 30 | 76 |
| YTD Return | -0.11% | +10.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +18.81% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.70% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.08% |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.1%Best | 45.1% |
| Fund Family | Guinness Atkinson Funds | SmartETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 12, 2026 | Nov 15, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
GAIQ vs MOTO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GAIQ vs MOTO Performance
Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund ETF (GAIQ) is an ETF from Guinness Atkinson Funds and Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) is an ETF from SmartETFs. Year to date, GAIQ is down 0.11% versus a gain of 10.57% for MOTO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAIQ charges 0.79% per year while MOTO charges 0.68%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $68 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAIQ currently yields 0.00% against 0.92% for MOTO.
Holdings Overlap
10.2% of GAIQ's money is in holdings MOTO also owns. 15.7% of MOTO's money is in holdings GAIQ also owns.
MOTO and GAIQ share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in GAIQ and 38 in MOTO, against full books of 30 and 76.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 17 positions for MOTO that do not appear in our book for GAIQ (45.4% of the fund), and 21 for GAIQ that do not appear in MOTO (70.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GAIQ and MOTO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAIQ or MOTO?
GAIQ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while MOTO charges 0.68%. MOTO is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between GAIQ and MOTO?
15.7% of MOTO's money is in holdings GAIQ also owns. 15.7% of MOTO's is in holdings GAIQ also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in GAIQ and 38 in MOTO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAIQ or MOTO?
GAIQ yields 0.00% while MOTO yields 0.92%, so MOTO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MOTO better than GAIQ?
MOTO has a lower expense ratio. GAIQ is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.