GAIQ vs RWIN
Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund ETF vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF
Which is better, GAIQ or RWIN?
RWIN costs less.
RWIN has a lower expense ratio. RWIN is less concentrated, with 21.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAIQ | RWIN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.42%Best |
| AUM | $657,287.68 | $20M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.20% |
| Holdings | 30 | 333 |
| YTD Return | -0.11% | +3.81%Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.1% | 21.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Guinness Atkinson Funds | Rayliant Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 12, 2026 | Apr 8, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
GAIQ vs RWIN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GAIQ vs RWIN Performance
Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund ETF (GAIQ) is an ETF from Guinness Atkinson Funds and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF (RWIN) is an ETF from Rayliant Asset Management. Year to date, GAIQ is down 0.11% versus a gain of 3.81% for RWIN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAIQ charges 0.79% per year while RWIN charges 0.42%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $42 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAIQ currently yields 0.00% against 1.20% for RWIN.
Holdings Overlap
3.3% of GAIQ's money is in holdings RWIN also owns. 1.1% of RWIN's money is in holdings GAIQ also owns.
GAIQ and RWIN share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in GAIQ and 165 in RWIN, against full books of 30 and 333.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 2 positions for RWIN that do not appear in our book for GAIQ (1.7% of the fund), and 23 for GAIQ that do not appear in RWIN (77.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GAIQ | Weight in RWIN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABBN:SMAbb Ltd | 3.27% | 1.07% | 2.20% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GAIQ and RWIN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAIQ or RWIN?
GAIQ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while RWIN charges 0.42%. RWIN is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between GAIQ and RWIN?
3.3% of GAIQ's money is in holdings RWIN also owns. 1.1% of RWIN's is in holdings GAIQ also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in GAIQ and 165 in RWIN.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAIQ or RWIN?
GAIQ yields 0.00% while RWIN yields 1.20%, so RWIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWIN better than GAIQ?
RWIN has a lower expense ratio. RWIN is less concentrated, with 21.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.