GBHI vs VTI
Gabelli High Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GBHI or VTI?
High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.
GBHI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GBHI | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.01%Best | 0.03% |
| AUM | $6M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.90% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 190 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +1.04% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.52% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 17, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GBHI vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GBHI vs VTI Performance
Gabelli High Income ETF (GBHI) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GBHI returned +2.52% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, GBHI is up 1.04% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GBHI charges 0.01% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $1 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GBHI currently yields 4.90% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.3% of VTI's money is in holdings GBHI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GBHI, our book for it covers 50.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
7 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in GBHI and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 190 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GBHI | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WRBWr Berkley Corp. | 0.34% | 0.03% | 0.31% |
| OKEOneok | 0.28% | 0.08% | 0.20% |
| VICIVici Properties Inc | 0.16% | 0.04% | 0.12% |
| ORealty Income Corp. | 0.12% | 0.08% | 0.04% |
| GLPIGaming And Leisure Properties Inc | 0.17% | 0.02% | 0.15% |
| VNOMViper Energy Inc Cl A | 0.13% | 0.01% | 0.12% |
| STWDStarwood Property Trust Inc Com Reit | 0.11% | 0.01% | 0.10% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GBHI and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GBHI or VTI?
GBHI has an expense ratio of 0.01% while VTI charges 0.03%. GBHI is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GBHI or VTI?
Over the past year GBHI returned +2.52% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GBHI or VTI?
GBHI yields 4.90% while VTI yields 1.06%, so GBHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GBHI?
GBHI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.