GDE vs QLTY
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund vs GMO US Quality ETF
Which is better, GDE or QLTY?
Each has led over a different period.
GDE has a lower expense ratio. GDE led over 3Y and the full window, QLTY over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GDE | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $462M | $5.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.19% | 0.66% |
| Holdings | 506 | 90 |
| YTD Return | +2.61% | +14.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.95% | +20.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +43.62%Best | +21.84% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.7% | -17.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $28,301Best | $17,733 |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | GMO |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 17, 2022 | Nov 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 15, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
GDE vs QLTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
GDE vs QLTY Performance
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO. Over the past year GDE returned +8.95% while QLTY returned +20.95%. Year to date, GDE is up 2.61% versus a gain of 14.13% for QLTY.
Over three years, GDE compounded at +43.62% per year against +21.84% for QLTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GDE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 11.9% for QLTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for GDE and -17.0% for QLTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GDE charges 0.20% per year while QLTY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $50 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GDE currently yields 4.19% against 0.66% for QLTY.
Holdings Overlap
At least 93.4% of QLTY's money is in holdings GDE also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GDE, our book for it covers 93.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of QLTY is already inside GDE. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
39 positions in common, counted across the 492 positions we hold weights for in GDE and 45 in QLTY, against full books of 506 and 90.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GDE | Weight in QLTY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.26% | 8.00% | 2.74% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.10% | 4.20% | 2.90% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 5.94% | 4.90% | 1.04% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.39% | 3.30% | 4.09% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.67% | 3.50% | 0.17% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.31% | 4.80% | 2.49% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.14% | 3.70% | 1.56% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.86% | 4.10% | 3.24% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 0.48% | 4.20% | 3.72% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 0.32% | 4.30% | 3.98% |
93.4% of QLTY is already inside GDE.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GDE or QLTY?
GDE has an expense ratio of 0.20% while QLTY charges 0.50%. GDE is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GDE or QLTY?
Over the past year GDE returned +8.95% vs +20.95% for QLTY, so QLTY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GDE or QLTY?
GDE has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 11.9% for QLTY. Worst drawdown: GDE -22.7% vs QLTY -17.0%.
Should I hold both GDE and QLTY?
GDE and QLTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GDE and QLTY?
At least 93.4% of QLTY's money is in holdings GDE also owns. Our book for GDE is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 492 positions we hold weights for in GDE and 45 in QLTY.
Which pays a higher dividend, GDE or QLTY?
GDE yields 4.19% while QLTY yields 0.66%, so GDE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLTY better than GDE?
GDE has a lower expense ratio. GDE led over 3Y and the full window, QLTY over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.