GGN vs HRTS

GGN vs HRTS

Which is better, GGN or HRTS?

Each has led over a different period.

HRTS has a lower expense ratio. GGN led over 3Y and the full window, HRTS over 1Y.

Lower Fees: HRTSHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGGNHRTS
Expense Ratio1.40%0.75%Best
AUM$1.0B$53M
Dividend Yield6.14%1.30%
Holdings22192
YTD Return+2.85%Best+2.75%
1Y Return+5.08%+14.59%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+19.86%Best+13.00%
5Y Return (annualized)+14.43%-
Volatility (annualized)18.7%17.1%Best
Max Drawdown-18.3%Best-24.7%
$10,000 over 2.9 years$17,310Best$14,254
Fund FamilyGabelli FundsTema Global Limited
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 29, 2005Nov 20, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 21, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).

GGN vs HRTS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.

Compare GGN against instead:GGN vs SPYGGN vs QQQGGN vs VOOGGN vs VTIHRTS against:HRTS vs VXUS

GGN vs HRTS Performance

GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust (GGN) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Tema Heart & Health ETF (HRTS) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited. Over the past year GGN returned +5.08% while HRTS returned +14.59%. Year to date, GGN is up 2.85% versus a gain of 2.75% for HRTS.

Over three years, GGN compounded at +19.86% per year against +13.00% for HRTS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GGN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 17.1% for HRTS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.3% for GGN and -24.7% for HRTS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.22. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GGN charges 1.40% per year while HRTS charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $140 vs $75 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGN currently yields 6.14% against 1.30% for HRTS.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 71 holdings in GGN and 46 in HRTS, totalling 81.1% and 100.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 93 days apart, GGN as of Jun 30, 2026 and HRTS as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in GGN and 46 in HRTS, against full books of 221 and 92.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GGN and HRTS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GGNHRTS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GGN or HRTS?

GGN has an expense ratio of 1.40% while HRTS charges 0.75%. HRTS is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GGN or HRTS?

Over the past year GGN returned +5.08% vs +14.59% for HRTS, so HRTS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GGN or HRTS?

GGN has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 17.1% for HRTS. Worst drawdown: GGN -18.3% vs HRTS -24.7%.

Should I hold both GGN and HRTS?

GGN and HRTS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.22, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GGN or HRTS?

GGN yields 6.14% while HRTS yields 1.30%, so GGN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is HRTS better than GGN?

HRTS has a lower expense ratio. GGN led over 3Y and the full window, HRTS over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.