GGN vs RWLC
GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF
Which is better, GGN or RWLC?
RWLC has been ahead.
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. RWLC led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGN | RWLC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.40% | 0.32%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $100M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.14% | 12.70% |
| Holdings | 221 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +2.85% | +18.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.08% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.86% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.43% | - |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 29, 2005 | Dec 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GGN vs RWLC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GGN vs RWLC Performance
GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust (GGN) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF (RWLC) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Year to date, GGN is up 2.85% versus a gain of 18.51% for RWLC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGN charges 1.40% per year while RWLC charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $140 vs $32 annually, a gap of $108 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGN currently yields 6.14% against 12.70% for RWLC.
Holdings Overlap
At least 6.0% of RWLC's money is in holdings GGN also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GGN, our book for it covers 81.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
RWLC and GGN share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 73 days apart, GGN as of Jun 30, 2026 and RWLC as of Sep 11, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
5 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in GGN and 101 in RWLC, against full books of 221 and 208.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GGN and RWLC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGN or RWLC?
GGN has an expense ratio of 1.40% while RWLC charges 0.32%. RWLC is the cheaper option, by $108 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between GGN and RWLC?
At least 6.0% of RWLC's money is in holdings GGN also owns. Our book for GGN is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in GGN and 101 in RWLC.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGN or RWLC?
GGN yields 6.14% while RWLC yields 12.70%, so RWLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWLC better than GGN?
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. RWLC led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.