GGN vs SECT
GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust vs Main Sector Rotation ETF
Which is better, GGN or SECT?
Each has led over a different period.
SECT has a lower expense ratio. GGN led over 3Y and 5Y, SECT over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGN | SECT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.40% | 0.69%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $2.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.14% | 0.69% |
| Holdings | 221 | 19 |
| YTD Return | +2.85% | +10.58%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.08% | +14.28%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.86%Best | +18.91% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.43%Best | +11.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.9%Best | 20.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -64.4% | -50.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,620Best | $17,474 |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 29, 2005 | Sep 5, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 16, 2016 to Oct 14, 2026 (9.8 years).
GGN vs SECT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
GGN vs SECT Performance
GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust (GGN) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) is an ETF from Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC. Over the past year GGN returned +5.08% while SECT returned +14.28%. Year to date, GGN is up 2.85% versus a gain of 10.58% for SECT.
Over three years, GGN compounded at +19.86% per year against +18.91% for SECT; over five years the annualized figures are +14.43% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, SECT has the edge at +6.85% annualized vs +4.63%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SECT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 19.9% for GGN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.4% for GGN and -50.1% for SECT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGN charges 1.40% per year while SECT charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $140 vs $69 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGN currently yields 6.14% against 0.69% for SECT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 71 holdings in GGN and 10 in SECT, totalling 81.1% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 93 days apart, GGN as of Jun 30, 2026 and SECT as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in GGN and 10 in SECT, against full books of 221 and 19.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GGN and SECT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGN or SECT?
GGN has an expense ratio of 1.40% while SECT charges 0.69%. SECT is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGN or SECT?
Over the past year GGN returned +5.08% vs +14.28% for SECT, so SECT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), GGN annualized +4.63% vs +6.85% for SECT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGN or SECT?
SECT has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 19.9% for GGN. Worst drawdown: GGN -64.4% vs SECT -50.1%.
Should I hold both GGN and SECT?
GGN and SECT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGN or SECT?
GGN yields 6.14% while SECT yields 0.69%, so GGN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SECT better than GGN?
SECT has a lower expense ratio. GGN led over 3Y and 5Y, SECT over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.