GHTA vs VTI
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GHTA or VTI?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GHTA | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $30M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.86% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 35 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -1.39% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.71% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.47% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.82% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3%Best | 15.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.9%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,269 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 81.3% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Goose Hollow Capital Management LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 16, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 17, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.9 years).
GHTA vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.
GHTA vs VTI Performance
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) is an ETF from Goose Hollow Capital Management LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GHTA returned +0.71% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, GHTA is down 1.39% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, GHTA compounded at +8.47% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.82% and +11.99% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 11.3% for GHTA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.9% for GHTA and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GHTA charges 1.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $149 vs $3 annually, a gap of $146 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GHTA currently yields 3.86% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
7.0% of GHTA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings GHTA also owns.
GHTA and VTI share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in GHTA and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 35 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,153 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GHTA (97.5% of the fund), and 17 for GHTA that do not appear in VTI (86.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GHTA and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GHTA or VTI?
GHTA has an expense ratio of 1.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $146 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GHTA or VTI?
Over the past year GHTA returned +0.71% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GHTA or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 11.3% for GHTA. Worst drawdown: GHTA -13.9% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both GHTA and VTI?
GHTA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GHTA and VTI?
7.0% of GHTA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's is in holdings GHTA also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in GHTA and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GHTA or VTI?
GHTA yields 3.86% while VTI yields 1.06%, so GHTA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GHTA?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.