GIAX vs ZALT
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF vs Innovator US Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
Which is better, GIAX or ZALT?
GIAX has been ahead.
ZALT has a lower expense ratio. GIAX led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GIAX | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.03% | 0.69%Best |
| AUM | $115M | $794M |
| Dividend Yield | 24.34% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 87 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +12.20%Best | +6.44% |
| 1Y Return | +12.86%Best | +9.12% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.33% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.7% | 3.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.4% | -8.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $13,082Best | $12,227 |
| Fund Family | XFunds | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jul 29, 2024 | Oct 2, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 30, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.2 years).
GIAX vs ZALT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
GIAX vs ZALT Performance
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) is an ETF from XFunds and Innovator US Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year GIAX returned +12.86% while ZALT returned +9.12%. Year to date, GIAX is up 12.20% versus a gain of 6.44% for ZALT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GIAX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.7% compared with 3.5% for ZALT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.4% for GIAX and -8.2% for ZALT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GIAX charges 1.03% per year while ZALT charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $103 vs $69 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GIAX currently yields 24.34% against 0.00% for ZALT.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GIAX and ZALT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GIAX or ZALT?
GIAX has an expense ratio of 1.03% while ZALT charges 0.69%. ZALT is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GIAX or ZALT?
Over the past year GIAX returned +12.86% vs +9.12% for ZALT, so GIAX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GIAX annualized +12.99% vs +9.57% for ZALT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GIAX or ZALT?
GIAX has been the more volatile fund at 20.7% annualized versus 3.5% for ZALT. Worst drawdown: GIAX -20.4% vs ZALT -8.2%.
Should I hold both GIAX and ZALT?
GIAX and ZALT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GIAX or ZALT?
GIAX yields 24.34% while ZALT yields 0.00%, so GIAX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZALT better than GIAX?
ZALT has a lower expense ratio. GIAX led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.