GLDW vs VXUS
Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, GLDW or VXUS?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLDW | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $18M | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 32.63% | 2.34% |
| Holdings | 8 | 8,844 |
| YTD Return | -21.90% | +10.00%Best |
| 1Y Return | -15.53% | +17.01%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.55% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.9% | 14.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GLDW vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GLDW vs VXUS Performance
Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLDW returned -15.53% while VXUS returned +17.01%. Year to date, GLDW is down 21.90% versus a gain of 10.00% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLDW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.9% compared with 14.8% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLDW charges 0.99% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $5 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLDW currently yields 32.63% against 2.34% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in GLDW and 8,425 in VXUS, totalling 136.2% and 91.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in GLDW and 8,425 in VXUS, against full books of 8 and 8,844.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GLDW and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLDW or VXUS?
GLDW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $94 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GLDW or VXUS?
Over the past year GLDW returned -15.53% vs +17.01% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GLDW or VXUS?
GLDW has been the more volatile fund at 32.9% annualized versus 14.8% for VXUS.
Should I hold both GLDW and VXUS?
GLDW and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLDW or VXUS?
GLDW yields 32.63% while VXUS yields 2.34%, so GLDW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than GLDW?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.