GLDW vs VYM

GLDW vs VYM

Which is better, GLDW or VYM?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns (1Y): VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGLDWVYM
Expense Ratio0.99%0.04%Best
AUM$18M$78.9B
Dividend Yield32.63%2.37%
Holdings8608
YTD Return-21.90%+11.83%Best
1Y Return-15.53%+15.96%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.60%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.51%
Volatility (annualized)32.9%11.2%Best
Fund FamilyRoundhill InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 30, 2025Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

GLDW vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GLDW vs VYM Performance

Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLDW returned -15.53% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, GLDW is down 21.90% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GLDW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.9% compared with 11.2% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GLDW charges 0.99% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $4 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLDW currently yields 32.63% against 2.37% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 2 holdings in GLDW and 602 in VYM, totalling 136.2% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in GLDW and 602 in VYM, against full books of 8 and 608.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GLDW and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GLDWVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLDW or VYM?

GLDW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $95 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GLDW or VYM?

Over the past year GLDW returned -15.53% vs +15.96% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GLDW or VYM?

GLDW has been the more volatile fund at 32.9% annualized versus 11.2% for VYM.

Should I hold both GLDW and VYM?

GLDW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GLDW or VYM?

GLDW yields 32.63% while VYM yields 2.37%, so GLDW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than GLDW?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.