GLGG vs IVV

GLGG vs IVV

Which is better, GLGG or IVV?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGLGGIVV
Expense Ratio0.76%0.03%Best
AUM$2M$896.5B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.10%
Holdings12508
YTD Return-76.68%+13.59%Best
1Y Return-93.33%+17.54%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.46%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.28%
Volatility (annualized)179.6%12.4%Best
Max Drawdown-93.7%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1.1 years$1,920$12,180Best
Fund FamilyLeverage SharesiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 21, 2025May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 21, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.1 years).

GLGG vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GLGG vs IVV Performance

Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF (GLGG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GLGG returned -93.33% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, GLGG is down 76.68% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GLGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 179.6% compared with 12.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -93.7% for GLGG and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GLGG charges 0.76% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $3 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLGG currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GLGG and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GLGGIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLGG or IVV?

GLGG has an expense ratio of 0.76% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GLGG or IVV?

Over the past year GLGG returned -93.33% vs +17.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GLGG annualized -77.69% vs +19.64% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GLGG or IVV?

GLGG has been the more volatile fund at 179.6% annualized versus 12.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GLGG -93.7% vs IVV -8.9%.

Should I hold both GLGG and IVV?

GLGG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GLGG or IVV?

GLGG yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than GLGG?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.