GLGG vs VOO

GLGG vs VOO

Which is better, GLGG or VOO?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGLGGVOO
Expense Ratio0.76%0.03%Best
AUM$2M$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings12506
YTD Return-76.68%+13.57%Best
1Y Return-93.33%+17.55%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.46%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.28%
Volatility (annualized)179.6%12.4%Best
Max Drawdown-93.7%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1.1 years$1,920$12,179Best
Fund FamilyLeverage SharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 21, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 21, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.1 years).

GLGG vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GLGG vs VOO Performance

Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF (GLGG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLGG returned -93.33% while VOO returned +17.55%. Year to date, GLGG is down 76.68% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GLGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 179.6% compared with 12.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -93.7% for GLGG and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GLGG charges 0.76% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $3 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLGG currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GLGG and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GLGGVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLGG or VOO?

GLGG has an expense ratio of 0.76% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GLGG or VOO?

Over the past year GLGG returned -93.33% vs +17.55% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GLGG annualized -77.69% vs +19.63% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GLGG or VOO?

GLGG has been the more volatile fund at 179.6% annualized versus 12.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GLGG -93.7% vs VOO -8.9%.

Should I hold both GLGG and VOO?

GLGG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GLGG or VOO?

GLGG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than GLGG?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.