GLIX vs IVV
Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GLIX or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLIX | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.61% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 58 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +6.75% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.44% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 13.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -10.2% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $10,764 | $11,555Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.8% | 38.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Lazard Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 6, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
GLIX vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
GLIX vs IVV Performance
Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX) is an ETF from Lazard Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GLIX returned +6.44% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, GLIX is up 6.75% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLIX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 13.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.2% for GLIX and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.16. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLIX charges 0.96% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $3 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLIX currently yields 2.61% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
45.1% of GLIX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.0% of IVV's money is in holdings GLIX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in GLIX and 506 in IVV, against full books of 58 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GLIX (98.5% of the fund), and 3 for GLIX that do not appear in IVV (8.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GLIX | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCICrown Castle International Corp | 7.55% | 0.04% | 7.51% |
| AMTAmerican Tower Corporation | 4.69% | 0.11% | 4.58% |
| EDConsolidated Edison Inc | 4.55% | 0.06% | 4.49% |
| EXCExelon | 4.27% | 0.06% | 4.21% |
| NSCNorfolk Southern Corp | 3.69% | 0.11% | 3.58% |
| AWKAmerican Water Works Co. Inc. | 3.67% | 0.04% | 3.63% |
| PNWPinnacle West Corp | 3.48% | 0.02% | 3.46% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 2.89% | 0.24% | 2.65% |
| EVRGEvergy Inc. | 2.85% | 0.03% | 2.82% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 1.96% | 0.10% | 1.86% |
45.1% of GLIX is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLIX or IVV?
GLIX has an expense ratio of 0.96% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $93 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GLIX or IVV?
Over the past year GLIX returned +6.44% vs +17.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GLIX annualized +7.64% vs +15.55% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GLIX or IVV?
GLIX has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 13.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GLIX -10.2% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both GLIX and IVV?
GLIX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.16, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GLIX and IVV?
45.1% of GLIX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.0% of IVV's is in holdings GLIX also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in GLIX and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLIX or IVV?
GLIX yields 2.61% while IVV yields 1.10%, so GLIX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GLIX?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.