GPT vs VYM
Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GPT or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GPT led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 31.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GPT | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $24M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.66% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 90 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +11.43% | +11.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.76% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0% | 11.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.6% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $13,769Best | $13,352 |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.5% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Intelligent Alpha | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
GPT vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
GPT vs VYM Performance
Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF (GPT) is an ETF from Intelligent Alpha and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GPT returned +14.76% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, GPT is up 11.43% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GPT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.0% compared with 11.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.6% for GPT and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GPT charges 0.69% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $4 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GPT currently yields 0.66% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
24.7% of GPT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 13.9% of VYM's money is in holdings GPT also owns.
GPT and VYM share little of their money.
19 positions in common, counted across the 75 positions we hold weights for in GPT and 602 in VYM, against full books of 90 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 554 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GPT (83.9% of the fund), and 43 for GPT that do not appear in VYM (59.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GPT | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.58% | 6.94% | 4.36% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.04% | 1.54% | 0.50% |
| ETNEaton Corp Plc | 2.80% | 0.63% | 2.17% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 2.35% | 0.54% | 1.81% |
| MPCMpc Un Equity | 2.34% | 0.44% | 1.90% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 1.89% | 0.31% | 1.58% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 1.71% | 0.40% | 1.31% |
| LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc. | 1.58% | 0.20% | 1.38% |
| HUBBHubbell Inc | 1.59% | 0.10% | 1.49% |
| GDGeneral Dynamics Corp. | 1.30% | 0.38% | 0.92% |
24.7% of GPT is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPT or VYM?
GPT has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GPT or VYM?
Over the past year GPT returned +14.76% vs +15.96% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GPT annualized +16.45% vs +14.76% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GPT or VYM?
GPT has been the more volatile fund at 13.0% annualized versus 11.0% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GPT -25.6% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both GPT and VYM?
GPT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GPT and VYM?
24.7% of GPT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 13.9% of VYM's is in holdings GPT also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 75 positions we hold weights for in GPT and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GPT or VYM?
GPT yields 0.66% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GPT?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GPT led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 31.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.