GQGU vs LRGC
GQG US Equity ETF vs AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Which is better, GQGU or LRGC?
LRGC has been ahead.
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. LRGC led over 1Y and the full window. LRGC is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GQGU | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $584M | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 0.53% |
| Holdings | 77 | 72 |
| YTD Return | +5.40% | +10.99%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.28% | +13.29%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8% | 11.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.4%Best | -10.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $10,428 | $12,131Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.2% | 44.8%Best |
| Fund Family | GQG Partners LLC | AllianceBernstein L.P. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 31, 2019 | Sep 20, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
GQGU vs LRGC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
GQGU vs LRGC Performance
GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) is an ETF from GQG Partners LLC and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Over the past year GQGU returned +3.28% while LRGC returned +13.29%. Year to date, GQGU is up 5.40% versus a gain of 10.99% for LRGC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GQGU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.8% compared with 11.4% for LRGC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.4% for GQGU and -10.0% for LRGC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.14. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GQGU charges 0.49% per year while LRGC charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $39 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GQGU currently yields 0.95% against 0.53% for LRGC.
Holdings Overlap
58.8% of GQGU's money is in holdings LRGC also owns. 46.2% of LRGC's money is in holdings GQGU also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in GQGU and 69 in LRGC, against full books of 77 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 51 positions for LRGC that do not appear in our book for GQGU (50.5% of the fund), and 22 for GQGU that do not appear in LRGC (39.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GQGU | Weight in LRGC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.37% | 8.71% | 0.66% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.16% | 6.66% | 1.50% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.83% | 5.71% | 2.12% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 7.25% | 6.09% | 1.16% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.76% | 4.69% | 2.07% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.56% | 2.93% | 0.37% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.68% | 3.44% | 1.76% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.08% | 0.76% | 3.32% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 2.18% | 0.95% | 1.23% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 1.46% | 1.56% | 0.10% |
58.8% of GQGU is already inside LRGC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GQGU or LRGC?
GQGU has an expense ratio of 0.49% while LRGC charges 0.39%. LRGC is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GQGU or LRGC?
Over the past year GQGU returned +3.28% vs +13.29% for LRGC, so LRGC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GQGU annualized +3.28% vs +16.02% for LRGC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GQGU or LRGC?
GQGU has been the more volatile fund at 11.8% annualized versus 11.4% for LRGC. Worst drawdown: GQGU -8.4% vs LRGC -10.0%.
Should I hold both GQGU and LRGC?
GQGU and LRGC have a monthly-return correlation of -0.14, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GQGU and LRGC?
58.8% of GQGU's money is in holdings LRGC also owns. 46.2% of LRGC's is in holdings GQGU also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in GQGU and 69 in LRGC.
Which pays a higher dividend, GQGU or LRGC?
GQGU yields 0.95% while LRGC yields 0.53%, so GQGU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LRGC better than GQGU?
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. LRGC led over 1Y and the full window. LRGC is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.