GRW vs GSGO
TCW Durable Growth ETF vs Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
Which is better, GRW or GSGO?
GSGO has been ahead.
GSGO has a lower expense ratio. GSGO led over 1Y. GRW is less concentrated, with 52.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRW | GSGO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.45%Best |
| AUM | $64M | $192M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 64 | 54 |
| YTD Return | +0.53% | +11.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | -2.86% | +12.54%Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.3%Best | 53.5% |
| Fund Family | TCW ETFs | Goldman Sachs Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 5, 2024 | May 24, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
GRW vs GSGO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GRW vs GSGO Performance
TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) is an ETF from TCW ETFs and Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Over the past year GRW returned -2.86% while GSGO returned +12.54%. Year to date, GRW is up 0.53% versus a gain of 11.08% for GSGO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRW charges 0.75% per year while GSGO charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $45 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRW currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for GSGO.
Holdings Overlap
35.1% of GRW's money is in holdings GSGO also owns. 35.8% of GSGO's money is in holdings GRW also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in GRW and 53 in GSGO, against full books of 64 and 54.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 42 positions for GSGO that do not appear in our book for GRW (60.2% of the fund), and 20 for GRW that do not appear in GSGO (55.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GRW | Weight in GSGO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.69% | 12.73% | 6.04% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.41% | 8.85% | 4.44% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.83% | 7.03% | 1.20% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.87% | 2.56% | 3.31% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 5.49% | 1.42% | 4.07% |
| ETNEaton Corp Plc | 3.56% | 1.41% | 2.15% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.91% | 1.02% | 0.89% |
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 1.30% | 0.82% | 0.48% |
35.8% of GSGO is already inside GRW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRW or GSGO?
GRW has an expense ratio of 0.75% while GSGO charges 0.45%. GSGO is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GRW or GSGO?
Over the past year GRW returned -2.86% vs +12.54% for GSGO, so GSGO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GRW and GSGO?
35.8% of GSGO's money is in holdings GRW also owns. 35.8% of GSGO's is in holdings GRW also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in GRW and 53 in GSGO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRW or GSGO?
GRW yields 0.00% while GSGO yields 0.00%, so GSGO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GSGO better than GRW?
GSGO has a lower expense ratio. GSGO led over 1Y. GRW is less concentrated, with 52.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.