GSC vs RESM
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF
Which is better, GSC or RESM?
RESM costs less.
RESM has a lower expense ratio. GSC is less concentrated, with 16.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSC | RESM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.32%Best |
| AUM | $286M | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.22% | 0.08% |
| Holdings | 197 | 2,051 |
| YTD Return | +10.48% | +13.69%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.01% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.86% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 16.3%Best | 76.5% |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2023 | Dec 11, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
GSC vs RESM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GSC vs RESM Performance
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity ETF (GSC) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Year to date, GSC is up 10.48% versus a gain of 13.69% for RESM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSC charges 0.75% per year while RESM charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $32 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSC currently yields 0.22% against 0.08% for RESM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 98 holdings in GSC and 25 in RESM, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in GSC and 25 in RESM, against full books of 197 and 2,051.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 7 positions for RESM that do not appear in our book for GSC (27.7% of the fund), and 91 for GSC that do not appear in RESM (94.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GSC and RESM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSC or RESM?
GSC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while RESM charges 0.32%. RESM is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSC or RESM?
GSC yields 0.22% while RESM yields 0.08%, so GSC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RESM better than GSC?
RESM has a lower expense ratio. GSC is less concentrated, with 16.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.