GSFP vs NBCC
Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF vs Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connected Consumer ETF
Which is better, GSFP or NBCC?
NBCC has been ahead.
NBCC has a lower expense ratio. NBCC led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSFP | NBCC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.55%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $7M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 0.69% |
| Holdings | 53 | 4 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.6% | 19.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4%Best | -27.5% |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $10,330 | $11,637Best |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Neuberger Berman |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2021 | Apr 6, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 27 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. GSFP has data through Jul 18, 2025 and NBCC through Aug 14, 2025.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2022 to Jul 18, 2025 (3.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GSFP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.6% compared with 19.2% for NBCC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for GSFP and -27.5% for NBCC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSFP charges 0.75% per year while NBCC charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $55 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSFP currently yields 1.01% against 0.69% for NBCC.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GSFP and NBCC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSFP or NBCC?
GSFP has an expense ratio of 0.75% while NBCC charges 0.55%. NBCC is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, GSFP or NBCC?
GSFP has been the more volatile fund at 20.6% annualized versus 19.2% for NBCC. Worst drawdown: GSFP -25.4% vs NBCC -27.5%.
Should I hold both GSFP and NBCC?
GSFP and NBCC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSFP or NBCC?
GSFP yields 1.01% while NBCC yields 0.69%, so GSFP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NBCC better than GSFP?
NBCC has a lower expense ratio. NBCC led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.