GUSA vs VYM
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US 1000 Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GUSA or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GUSA led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GUSA | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $2.5B | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 2,012 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +12.95%Best | +11.83% |
| 1Y Return | +16.49%Best | +15.96% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.86%Best | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 13.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.5 years | $18,147Best | $16,111 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.3% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 5, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 12, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.5 years).
GUSA vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.5 years both funds cover.
GUSA vs VYM Performance
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GUSA returned +16.49% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, GUSA is up 12.95% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Over three years, GUSA compounded at +21.86% per year against +18.60% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GUSA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.9% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for GUSA and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GUSA charges 0.10% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $4 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUSA currently yields 0.98% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
33.2% of GUSA's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 94.3% of VYM's money is in holdings GUSA also owns.
Most of VYM is already inside GUSA. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
377 positions in common, counted across the 1,004 positions we hold weights for in GUSA and 602 in VYM, against full books of 2,012 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 197 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GUSA (3.5% of the fund), and 559 for GUSA that do not appear in VYM (66.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GUSA | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.40% | 6.94% | 4.54% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.35% | 3.83% | 2.48% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.98% | 2.70% | 1.72% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.92% | 2.58% | 1.66% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc Accenture Plc, Class A | 0.64% | 1.83% | 1.19% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.60% | 1.76% | 1.16% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 0.56% | 1.65% | 1.09% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 0.57% | 1.54% | 0.97% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.53% | 1.46% | 0.93% |
| MRKMerck & Co | 0.51% | 1.47% | 0.96% |
94.3% of VYM is already inside GUSA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GUSA or VYM?
GUSA has an expense ratio of 0.10% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GUSA or VYM?
Over the past year GUSA returned +16.49% vs +15.96% for VYM, so GUSA leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GUSA or VYM?
GUSA has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.9% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GUSA -19.6% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both GUSA and VYM?
GUSA and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GUSA and VYM?
94.3% of VYM's money is in holdings GUSA also owns. 94.3% of VYM's is in holdings GUSA also owns. They hold 377 positions in common, counted across the 1,004 positions we hold weights for in GUSA and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GUSA or VYM?
GUSA yields 0.98% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GUSA?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GUSA led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.