GUSE vs PWRD

GUSE vs PWRD

Which is better, GUSE or PWRD?

GUSE has been ahead.

GUSE has a lower expense ratio. GUSE led over 1Y. GUSE is less concentrated, with 40.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.6%.

Lower Fees: GUSEHigher Returns (1Y): GUSELess Concentrated: GUSE

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGUSEPWRD
Expense Ratio0.30%Best0.75%
AUM$365M$1.5B
Dividend Yield0.64%0.06%
Holdings12156
YTD Return+13.52%Best+3.29%
1Y Return+17.06%Best+2.06%
3Y Return (annualized)-+25.66%
Top 10 Weight40.0%Best50.6%
Fund FamilyGoldman Sachs Asset ManagementTCW ETFs
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 31, 2008Feb 2, 2022

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

GUSE vs PWRD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare GUSE against instead:GUSE vs SPYGUSE vs QQQGUSE vs VOOGUSE vs VTIPWRD against:PWRD vs VXUS

GUSE vs PWRD Performance

Goldman Sachs Enhanced US Equity ETF (GUSE) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) is an ETF from TCW ETFs. Over the past year GUSE returned +17.06% while PWRD returned +2.06%. Year to date, GUSE is up 13.52% versus a gain of 3.29% for PWRD.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GUSE charges 0.30% per year while PWRD charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $75 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUSE currently yields 0.64% against 0.06% for PWRD.

Holdings Overlap

GUSE already in PWRD9.8%
PWRD already in GUSE49.1%

9.8% of GUSE's money is in holdings PWRD also owns. 49.1% of PWRD's money is in holdings GUSE also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

12 positions in common, counted across the 122 positions we hold weights for in GUSE and 28 in PWRD, against full books of 121 and 56.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 11 positions for PWRD that do not appear in our book for GUSE (35.6% of the fund), and 107 for GUSE that do not appear in PWRD (88.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GUSEWeight in PWRDDifference
GEGeneral Electric Co.0.73%8.02%7.29%
ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock0.53%5.72%5.19%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.39%3.79%1.40%
KLACKla-tencor0.71%5.32%4.61%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.0.93%4.88%3.95%
XOMExxonmobil Corp.1.08%3.35%2.27%
ETNEaton Corp Plc0.50%3.75%3.25%
GEVGe Vernova, Inc.0.57%3.56%2.99%
TTTrane Technologies PLC|1250.41%3.58%3.17%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd0.64%3.32%2.68%

49.1% of PWRD is already inside GUSE.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

GUSEPWRD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GUSE or PWRD?

GUSE has an expense ratio of 0.30% while PWRD charges 0.75%. GUSE is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GUSE or PWRD?

Over the past year GUSE returned +17.06% vs +2.06% for PWRD, so GUSE leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between GUSE and PWRD?

49.1% of PWRD's money is in holdings GUSE also owns. 49.1% of PWRD's is in holdings GUSE also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 122 positions we hold weights for in GUSE and 28 in PWRD.

Which pays a higher dividend, GUSE or PWRD?

GUSE yields 0.64% while PWRD yields 0.06%, so GUSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PWRD better than GUSE?

GUSE has a lower expense ratio. GUSE led over 1Y. GUSE is less concentrated, with 40.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.