HFUL vs PHO
New Age Alpha UK Leading ETF vs Invesco Water Resources ETF
Which is better, HFUL or PHO?
PHO costs less.
PHO has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HFUL | PHO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.59%Best |
| AUM | - | $1.9B |
| Dividend Yield | - | 0.55% |
| Holdings | - | 87 |
| YTD Price Return | - | -2.37% |
| 1Y Price Return | - | -5.34% |
| 3Y Price Return (annualized) | - | +9.16% |
| 5Y Price Return (annualized) | - | +4.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 18.7% |
| Max Drawdown | - | -55.8% |
| Fund Family | New Age Alpha | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 22, 2019 | Dec 6, 2005 |
Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for HFUL. We have no price series for HFUL, so there is nothing to compare it against.
HFUL vs PHO Performance
New Age Alpha UK Leading ETF (HFUL) is an ETF from New Age Alpha and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) is an ETF from Invesco (US).
Fees and Cost Over Time
HFUL charges 0.60% per year while PHO charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $59 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HFUL and PHO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HFUL or PHO?
HFUL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while PHO charges 0.59%. PHO is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Is PHO better than HFUL?
PHO has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.