IBD vs VOO

IBD vs VOO

Which is better, IBD or VOO?

VOO has been ahead.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIBDVOO
Expense Ratio0.41%0.03%Best
AUM$503M$1.0T
Dividend Yield4.39%1.06%
Holdings501506
YTD Return-1.39%+13.57%Best
1Y Return-0.71%+17.55%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+5.04%+22.46%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+0.93%+13.28%Best
Volatility (annualized)5.0%Best15.9%
Max Drawdown-16.3%Best-34.3%
$10,000 over 5 years$10,474$18,654Best
Fund FamilyInspire ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
Style-Large Cap Blend
InceptionJul 10, 2017Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 11, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9.3 years).

IBD vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IBD vs VOO Performance

Inspire Corporate Bond ETF (IBD) is an ETF from Inspire ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBD returned -0.71% while VOO returned +17.55%. Year to date, IBD is down 1.39% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.

Over three years, IBD compounded at +5.04% per year against +22.46% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.93% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.30% annualized vs +1.00%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 5.0% for IBD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.3% for IBD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IBD charges 0.41% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $3 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBD currently yields 4.39% against 1.06% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

VOO already in IBD0.5%

At least 0.5% of VOO's money is in holdings IBD also owns.

Stated as a floor: for IBD, our book for it covers 92.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.

1 positions in common, counted across the 220 positions we hold weights for in IBD and 504 in VOO, against full books of 501 and 506.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IBDWeight in VOODifference
GEGeneral Electric Co 6.75% 03/15/20320.21%0.53%0.32%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IBD and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IBDVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IBD or VOO?

IBD has an expense ratio of 0.41% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IBD or VOO?

Over the past year IBD returned -0.71% vs +17.55% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IBD annualized +1.00% vs +14.30% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IBD or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 5.0% for IBD. Worst drawdown: IBD -16.3% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both IBD and VOO?

IBD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IBD or VOO?

IBD yields 4.39% while VOO yields 1.06%, so IBD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than IBD?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.