IDE vs QQQ

IDE vs QQQ

Which is better, IDE or QQQ?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IDE is less concentrated, with 14.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQLess Concentrated: IDE

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIDEQQQ
Expense Ratio1.22%0.18%Best
AUM$199M$506.1B
Dividend Yield9.12%0.42%
Holdings281321
YTD Return+5.53%+19.30%Best
1Y Return+10.97%+22.47%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+21.37%+26.18%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+10.30%+15.42%Best
Volatility (annualized)19.9%17.6%Best
Max Drawdown-70.5%-35.1%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$16,326$20,484Best
Top 10 Weight14.0%Best46.7%
Fund FamilyVoya Investment ManagementInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJan 26, 2010Mar 10, 1999

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 27, 2010 to Oct 14, 2026 (16.7 years).

IDE vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IDE vs QQQ Performance

Voya Infrastructure Industrials and Materials Fund (IDE) is an ETF from Voya Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IDE returned +10.97% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, IDE is up 5.53% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.

Over three years, IDE compounded at +21.37% per year against +26.18% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +10.30% and +15.42% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.42% annualized vs +0.26%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IDE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 17.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.5% for IDE and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IDE charges 1.22% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $122 vs $18 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDE currently yields 9.12% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

IDE already in QQQ5.9%
QQQ already in IDE8.1%

5.9% of IDE's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 8.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings IDE also owns.

QQQ and IDE share little of their money.

The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, IDE as of Jul 31, 2026 and QQQ as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

14 positions in common, counted across the 274 positions we hold weights for in IDE and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 281 and 321.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 78 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for IDE (88.2% of the fund), and 82 for IDE that do not appear in QQQ (43.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IDEWeight in QQQDifference
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares1.63%1.77%0.14%
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies Corp.0.10%2.70%2.60%
TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#5855580.82%0.73%0.09%
BKRBaker Hughes A Ge Co. Class A0.53%0.23%0.30%
HONHoneywell International Inc0.46%0.28%0.18%
AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc0.36%0.27%0.09%
CMCSAComcast Corp. Class A0.29%0.32%0.03%
CEGConstellation Energy Corp0.21%0.38%0.17%
EXCExelon Corp.0.39%0.17%0.22%
LITELumentum Holdings Inc0.18%0.36%0.18%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IDE and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IDEQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IDE or QQQ?

IDE has an expense ratio of 1.22% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IDE or QQQ?

Over the past year IDE returned +10.97% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), IDE annualized +0.26% vs +18.42% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IDE or QQQ?

IDE has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 17.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: IDE -70.5% vs QQQ -35.1%.

Should I hold both IDE and QQQ?

IDE and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between IDE and QQQ?

8.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings IDE also owns. 8.1% of QQQ's is in holdings IDE also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 274 positions we hold weights for in IDE and 101 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, IDE or QQQ?

IDE yields 9.12% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so IDE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than IDE?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IDE is less concentrated, with 14.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.