IFLR vs VXUS

IFLR vs VXUS

Which is better, IFLR or VXUS?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns (1Y): VXUS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIFLRVXUS
Expense Ratio0.89%0.05%Best
AUM$99M$163.2B
Dividend Yield1.13%2.34%
Holdings6868,844
YTD Return+3.63%+10.00%Best
1Y Return+9.15%+17.01%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+19.55%
5Y Return (annualized)-+8.55%
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 20, 2025Jan 26, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

IFLR vs VXUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IFLR vs VXUS Performance

Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IFLR returned +9.15% while VXUS returned +17.01%. Year to date, IFLR is up 3.63% versus a gain of 10.00% for VXUS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IFLR charges 0.89% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $5 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IFLR currently yields 1.13% against 2.34% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

IFLR already in VXUS63.1%

At least 63.1% of IFLR's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 91.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

213 positions in common, counted across the 314 positions we hold weights for in IFLR and 8,425 in VXUS, against full books of 686 and 8,844.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IFLRWeight in VXUSDifference
SHELShell Plc1.38%0.56%0.82%
NOVN:SMNovartis Ag – Class N1.26%0.62%0.64%
NESN:SMNestle Sa1.20%0.55%0.65%
SIE:SGSiemens N Ag1.11%0.53%0.58%
AZN:LNAstraZeneca PLC1.10%0.53%0.57%
BHP:AUBhp Group Ltd1.07%0.33%0.74%
TTE:PATotal Fina Elf Holdings Usa, Inc.0.98%0.37%0.61%
SU:PASchneider Electric0.91%0.40%0.51%
CBA:AUCommonwealth Bank Of Australia0.85%0.42%0.43%
ABBN:SMAbb Ltd.[Abbn]0.86%0.33%0.53%

63.1% of IFLR is already inside VXUS.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IFLRVXUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IFLR or VXUS?

IFLR has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $84 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IFLR or VXUS?

Over the past year IFLR returned +9.15% vs +17.01% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between IFLR and VXUS?

At least 63.1% of IFLR's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 213 positions in common, counted across the 314 positions we hold weights for in IFLR and 8,425 in VXUS.

Which pays a higher dividend, IFLR or VXUS?

IFLR yields 1.13% while VXUS yields 2.34%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VXUS better than IFLR?

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.