IQRA vs RWIN
NYLI CBRE Real Assets ETF vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF
Which is better, IQRA or RWIN?
RWIN costs less.
RWIN has a lower expense ratio. RWIN is less concentrated, with 21.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IQRA | RWIN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.42%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $20M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.65% | 1.20% |
| Holdings | 107 | 333 |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.1% | 21.3%Best |
| Fund Family | IndexIQ Trust | Rayliant Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 10, 2023 | Apr 8, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 48 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IQRA has data through Aug 27, 2026 and RWIN through Oct 14, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IQRA charges 0.65% per year while RWIN charges 0.42%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $42 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IQRA currently yields 2.65% against 1.20% for RWIN.
Holdings Overlap
2.3% of IQRA's money is in holdings RWIN also owns. 0.9% of RWIN's money is in holdings IQRA also owns.
IQRA and RWIN share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 94 days apart, IQRA as of Jun 30, 2026 and RWIN as of Oct 2, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
4 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in IQRA and 165 in RWIN, against full books of 107 and 333.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for RWIN that do not appear in our book for IQRA (1.7% of the fund), and 50 for IQRA that do not appear in RWIN (63.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IQRA and RWIN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IQRA or RWIN?
IQRA has an expense ratio of 0.65% while RWIN charges 0.42%. RWIN is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IQRA and RWIN?
2.3% of IQRA's money is in holdings RWIN also owns. 0.9% of RWIN's is in holdings IQRA also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in IQRA and 165 in RWIN.
Which pays a higher dividend, IQRA or RWIN?
IQRA yields 2.65% while RWIN yields 1.20%, so IQRA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWIN better than IQRA?
RWIN has a lower expense ratio. RWIN is less concentrated, with 21.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.