IVV vs LCO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF
Which is better, IVV or LCO?
Large Cap Blend against Allocation/Balanced.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LCO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.13% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $58M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 89 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | +6.69% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | LOGIQ Capital LLC |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Allocation/Balanced |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 8, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs LCO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs LCO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) is an ETF from LOGIQ Capital LLC. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 6.69% for LCO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LCO charges 1.13%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $113 annually, a gap of $110 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for LCO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 24.9% of IVV's money is in holdings LCO also owns.
Stated as a floor: for LCO, our book for it covers 92.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and LCO share little of their money.
30 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 79 in LCO, against full books of 508 and 89.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in LCO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 2.18% | 6.26% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.68% | 1.77% | 1.91% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.42% | 2.38% | 0.04% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.41% | 2.37% | 0.04% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.87% | 2.83% | 0.96% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 0.39% | 3.44% | 3.05% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 0.90% | 2.26% | 1.36% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc | 1.52% | 0.64% | 0.88% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.66% | 1.44% | 0.78% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 0.14% | 1.83% | 1.69% |
24.9% of IVV is already inside LCO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LCO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LCO charges 1.13%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $110 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LCO?
At least 24.9% of IVV's money is in holdings LCO also owns. Our book for LCO is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 79 in LCO.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LCO?
IVV yields 1.10% while LCO yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LCO better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.