IVV vs NBIG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF
Which is better, IVV or NBIG?
Large Cap Blend against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NBIG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.76% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $114M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 14 |
| YTD Return | +14.84% | +84.58%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.70%Best | -20.28% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.93% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.91% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2%Best | 195.1% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Leverage Shares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 27, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs NBIG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs NBIG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +18.70% while NBIG returned -20.28%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.84% versus a gain of 84.58% for NBIG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 195.1% compared with 13.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NBIG charges 0.76%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $76 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for NBIG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 3 in NBIG, totalling 99.9% and 60.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 3 in NBIG, against full books of 508 and 14.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and NBIG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NBIG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NBIG charges 0.76%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NBIG?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.70% vs -20.28% for NBIG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NBIG?
NBIG has been the more volatile fund at 195.1% annualized versus 13.2% for IVV.
Should I hold both IVV and NBIG?
IVV and NBIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NBIG?
IVV yields 1.06% while NBIG yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NBIG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.