NBIG vs VYM
Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, NBIG or VYM?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBIG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $77M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 14 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +47.20%Best | +11.83% |
| 1Y Return | -36.43% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 198.6% | 11.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
NBIG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NBIG vs VYM Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBIG returned -36.43% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, NBIG is up 47.20% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 198.6% compared with 11.2% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.06. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBIG charges 0.76% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $4 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBIG currently yields 0.00% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in NBIG and 602 in VYM, totalling 59.7% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in NBIG and 602 in VYM, against full books of 14 and 608.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NBIG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBIG or VYM?
NBIG has an expense ratio of 0.76% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NBIG or VYM?
Over the past year NBIG returned -36.43% vs +15.96% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NBIG or VYM?
NBIG has been the more volatile fund at 198.6% annualized versus 11.2% for VYM.
Should I hold both NBIG and VYM?
NBIG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.06, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBIG or VYM?
NBIG yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than NBIG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.