IVV vs NMBL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF
Which is better, IVV or NMBL?
Large Cap Blend against Allocation/Balanced.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NMBL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.99% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $24M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.88% |
| Holdings | 508 | 80 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | +3.69% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54%Best | +3.93% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 10.1%Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 57.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | NovaTide |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Allocation/Balanced |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 30, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs NMBL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs NMBL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF (NMBL) is an ETF from NovaTide. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while NMBL returned +3.93%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 3.69% for NMBL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 10.1% for NMBL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NMBL charges 1.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $199 annually, a gap of $196 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.88% for NMBL.
Holdings Overlap
17.9% of IVV's money is in holdings NMBL also owns. 1.6% of NMBL's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
IVV and NMBL share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 38 in NMBL, against full books of 508 and 80.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 34 positions for NMBL that do not appear in our book for IVV (95.9% of the fund), and 497 for IVV that do not appear in NMBL (81.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and NMBL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NMBL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NMBL charges 1.99%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $196 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NMBL?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +3.93% for NMBL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NMBL?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 10.1% for NMBL.
Should I hold both IVV and NMBL?
IVV and NMBL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NMBL?
17.9% of IVV's money is in holdings NMBL also owns. 1.6% of NMBL's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 38 in NMBL.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NMBL?
IVV yields 1.10% while NMBL yields 0.88%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NMBL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.