IVV vs NTKI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Nationwide Russell 2000 Risk-Managed Income ETF
Which is better, IVV or NTKI?
Large Cap Blend against Small Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NTKI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.70% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 6.01% |
| Holdings | 508 | 13 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 11.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5% | -19.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $12,976Best | $8,811 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Nationwide |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 16, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 712 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Oct 14, 2026 and NTKI through Nov 1, 2024.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 17, 2021 to Nov 1, 2024 (2.9 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 11.2% for NTKI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for IVV and -19.9% for NTKI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NTKI charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $70 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 6.01% for NTKI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and NTKI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NTKI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NTKI charges 0.70%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or NTKI?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 11.2% for NTKI. Worst drawdown: IVV -24.5% vs NTKI -19.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and NTKI?
IVV and NTKI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NTKI?
IVV yields 1.10% while NTKI yields 6.01%, so NTKI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NTKI better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.