IVV vs POW
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF
Which is better, IVV or POW?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. POW led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | POW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $62M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.14% |
| Holdings | 508 | 63 |
| YTD Return | +13.59% | +22.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.54% | +22.69%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2%Best | 41.5% |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 42.7% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | VistaShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 28, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs POW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs POW Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) is an ETF from VistaShares. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while POW returned +22.69%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 22.06% for POW.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
POW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 41.5% compared with 13.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while POW charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.14% for POW.
Holdings Overlap
1.8% of IVV's money is in holdings POW also owns. 29.8% of POW's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
POW and IVV share little of their money.
15 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 51 in POW, against full books of 508 and 63.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 17 positions for POW that do not appear in our book for IVV (28.6% of the fund), and 485 for IVV that do not appear in POW (97.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in POW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PWRQuanta Services Inc | 0.15% | 5.31% | 5.16% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 0.40% | 3.45% | 3.05% |
| BECfd Bloom Energy Corp- A | 0.12% | 3.24% | 3.12% |
| HUBBHubbell Inc | 0.04% | 2.98% | 2.94% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 0.10% | 2.66% | 2.56% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 0.24% | 2.02% | 1.78% |
| XELXcel Energy Inc. | 0.07% | 2.05% | 1.98% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 0.32% | 1.76% | 1.44% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 0.13% | 1.40% | 1.27% |
| VSTVistra Energy Corp. | 0.07% | 1.41% | 1.34% |
29.8% of POW is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or POW?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while POW charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or POW?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +22.69% for POW, so POW leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or POW?
POW has been the more volatile fund at 41.5% annualized versus 13.2% for IVV.
Should I hold both IVV and POW?
IVV and POW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and POW?
29.8% of POW's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 29.8% of POW's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 51 in POW.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or POW?
IVV yields 1.10% while POW yields 0.14%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is POW better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. POW led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.