IVV vs SMHC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs VanEck China Semiconductor ETF
Which is better, IVV or SMHC?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SMHC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $14M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 57 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | -37.22% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 23, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs SMHC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs SMHC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VanEck China Semiconductor ETF (SMHC) is an ETF from VanEck. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a loss of 37.22% for SMHC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SMHC charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for SMHC.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 506 holdings in IVV and 25 in SMHC, totalling 99.9% and 94.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 25 in SMHC, against full books of 508 and 57.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and SMHC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SMHC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SMHC charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SMHC?
IVV yields 1.10% while SMHC yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SMHC better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.