SMHC vs VXUS

SMHC vs VXUS

Which is better, SMHC or VXUS?

VXUS costs less.

VXUS has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: VXUS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSMHCVXUS
Expense Ratio0.65%0.05%Best
AUM$14M$163.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.34%
Holdings578,844
YTD Return-37.22%+10.00%Best
1Y Return-+17.01%
3Y Return (annualized)-+19.55%
5Y Return (annualized)-+8.55%
Fund FamilyVanEckVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 23, 2026Jan 26, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

SMHC vs VXUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

SMHC vs VXUS Performance

VanEck China Semiconductor ETF (SMHC) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SMHC is down 37.22% versus a gain of 10.00% for VXUS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SMHC charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMHC currently yields 0.00% against 2.34% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 25 holdings in SMHC and 8,425 in VXUS, totalling 94.0% and 91.3% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 25 positions appear in both.

25 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in SMHC and 8,425 in VXUS, against full books of 57 and 8,844.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SMHCWeight in VXUSDifference
688256:SHCambricon Technologies-A9.40%0.01%9.39%
688041:SHHygon Information Technology Ltd A7.76%0.01%7.75%
002371:SHNaura Technology Group Co. Ltd. Class A6.66%0.01%6.65%
688012:SHAdvanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment Inc China - Class A Shares4.76%0.01%4.75%
1347:HKHua Hong Semiconductor Ltd4.69%0.02%4.67%
688008:SHMontage Technology Co Ltd-A4.61%0.00%4.61%
603986:SHGigadevice Semiconductor Beiji4.57%0.01%4.56%
002463:SHWus Printed Circuit Kunsha-A4.48%0.01%4.47%
688072:SHPiotech Inc. Class A4.28%0.00%4.28%
002384:SHSuzhou Dongshan Precision Manufacturing Co Ltd4.23%0.01%4.22%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of SMHC and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

SMHCVXUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SMHC or VXUS?

SMHC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, SMHC or VXUS?

SMHC yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.34%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VXUS better than SMHC?

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.