IVV vs STXG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Strive 1000 Growth ETF
Which is better, IVV or STXG?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, STXG over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | STXG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $154M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.47% |
| Holdings | 508 | 709 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | +11.85% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54%Best | +14.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46% | +23.21%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 15.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -21.2% |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $20,601 | $22,271Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 46.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Strive Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 10, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 17, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.9 years).
IVV vs STXG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs STXG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) is an ETF from Strive Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while STXG returned +14.59%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 11.85% for STXG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.46% per year against +23.21% for STXG. Across the full 4-year window we track, STXG has the edge at +22.79% annualized vs +20.36%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
STXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -21.2% for STXG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while STXG charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.47% for STXG.
Holdings Overlap
87.8% of IVV's money is in holdings STXG also owns. 93.3% of STXG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of STXG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
351 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 705 in STXG, against full books of 508 and 709.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 260 positions for STXG that do not appear in our book for IVV (6.3% of the fund), and 150 for IVV that do not appear in STXG (11.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in STXG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 9.23% | 0.79% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.29% | 9.02% | 1.73% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 7.06% | 1.30% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.68% | 4.71% | 1.03% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.00% | 3.81% | 0.81% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.41% | 3.12% | 0.71% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.47% | 3.03% | 0.56% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.42% | 2.65% | 0.23% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.51% | 2.39% | 0.88% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.87% | 1.66% | 0.21% |
93.3% of STXG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or STXG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while STXG charges 0.18%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or STXG?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +14.59% for STXG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +20.36% vs +22.79% for STXG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or STXG?
STXG has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs STXG -21.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and STXG?
IVV and STXG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and STXG?
93.3% of STXG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 93.3% of STXG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 351 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 705 in STXG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or STXG?
IVV yields 1.10% while STXG yields 0.47%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is STXG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, STXG over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.