IVV vs TGLR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Wedbush LAFFER | TENGLER New Era Value ETF
Which is better, IVV or TGLR?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TGLR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $36M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.96% |
| Holdings | 508 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +13.59%Best | +7.98% |
| 1Y Return | +17.54%Best | +11.91% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.46%Best | +20.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7%Tie | 12.7%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -19.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $18,033Best | $16,952 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 44.2% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Wedbush Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 13, 2026 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
IVV vs TGLR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TGLR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Wedbush LAFFER | TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) is an ETF from Wedbush Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% while TGLR returned +11.91%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.59% versus a gain of 7.98% for TGLR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.46% per year against +20.41% for TGLR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV and TGLR have been equally volatile, both at 12.7% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -19.8% for TGLR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TGLR charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.96% for TGLR.
Holdings Overlap
43.9% of IVV's money is in holdings TGLR also owns. 96.3% of TGLR's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of TGLR is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
28 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 30 in TGLR, against full books of 508 and 33.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for TGLR that do not appear in our book for IVV (1.6% of the fund), and 472 for IVV that do not appear in TGLR (55.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TGLR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 4.18% | 4.26% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 5.11% | 0.65% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.29% | 3.25% | 4.04% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.68% | 3.52% | 0.16% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.47% | 4.41% | 1.94% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.00% | 3.61% | 0.61% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.34% | 4.51% | 3.17% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 0.64% | 5.19% | 4.55% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.69% | 4.54% | 3.85% |
| AXPAmerican Express Co. | 0.24% | 4.61% | 4.37% |
96.3% of TGLR is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TGLR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TGLR charges 0.85%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TGLR?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.54% vs +11.91% for TGLR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TGLR?
IVV and TGLR have been equally volatile, both at 12.7% annualized. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs TGLR -19.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and TGLR?
IVV and TGLR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TGLR?
96.3% of TGLR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 96.3% of TGLR's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 30 in TGLR.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TGLR?
IVV yields 1.10% while TGLR yields 0.96%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TGLR better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.