JHAC vs XDAT
John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF vs Franklin Exponential Data ETF
Which is better, JHAC or XDAT?
JHAC has been ahead.
XDAT has a lower expense ratio. JHAC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. JHAC is less concentrated, with 45.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JHAC | XDAT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $4M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.32% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 51 | 63 |
| YTD Return | +2.75% | +7.49%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.89%Best | -0.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.84%Best | +13.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -1.23% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6%Best | 21.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4%Best | -29.6% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $15,318Best | $15,165 |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.9%Best | 58.9% |
| Fund Family | John Hancock Investment Management | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2023 | Jan 12, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 2, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
JHAC vs XDAT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
JHAC vs XDAT Performance
John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year JHAC returned +3.89% while XDAT returned -0.61%. Year to date, JHAC is up 2.75% versus a gain of 7.49% for XDAT.
Over three years, JHAC compounded at +15.84% per year against +13.81% for XDAT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XDAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 14.6% for JHAC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for JHAC and -29.6% for XDAT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JHAC charges 0.72% per year while XDAT charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $50 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JHAC currently yields 2.32% against 0.00% for XDAT.
Holdings Overlap
20.6% of JHAC's money is in holdings XDAT also owns. 21.0% of XDAT's money is in holdings JHAC also owns.
XDAT and JHAC share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in JHAC and 61 in XDAT, against full books of 51 and 63.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 49 positions for XDAT that do not appear in our book for JHAC (74.4% of the fund), and 40 for JHAC that do not appear in XDAT (71.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
21.0% of XDAT is already inside JHAC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JHAC or XDAT?
JHAC has an expense ratio of 0.72% while XDAT charges 0.50%. XDAT is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JHAC or XDAT?
Over the past year JHAC returned +3.89% vs -0.61% for XDAT, so JHAC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JHAC or XDAT?
XDAT has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 14.6% for JHAC. Worst drawdown: JHAC -24.4% vs XDAT -29.6%.
Should I hold both JHAC and XDAT?
JHAC and XDAT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between JHAC and XDAT?
21.0% of XDAT's money is in holdings JHAC also owns. 21.0% of XDAT's is in holdings JHAC also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in JHAC and 61 in XDAT.
Which pays a higher dividend, JHAC or XDAT?
JHAC yields 2.32% while XDAT yields 0.00%, so JHAC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XDAT better than JHAC?
XDAT has a lower expense ratio. JHAC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. JHAC is less concentrated, with 45.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.