JLCO vs USMC

JLCO vs USMC

Which is better, JLCO or USMC?

USMC costs less.

USMC has a lower expense ratio. JLCO is less concentrated, with 47.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%.

Lower Fees: USMCLess Concentrated: JLCO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJLCOUSMC
Expense Ratio0.39%0.12%Best
AUM$11M$5.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.74%
Holdings10858
YTD Return+2.73%+13.98%Best
1Y Return-+14.91%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.22%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.81%
Top 10 Weight47.1%Best55.3%
Fund FamilyJohn Hancock Investment ManagementPrincipal Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 14, 2026Oct 11, 2017

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

JLCO vs USMC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare JLCO against instead:JLCO vs SPYJLCO vs QQQJLCO vs VOOJLCO vs VTIUSMC against:USMC vs VXUS

JLCO vs USMC Performance

John Hancock Large Cap Opportunities ETF (JLCO) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is an ETF from Principal Funds. Year to date, JLCO is up 2.73% versus a gain of 13.98% for USMC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JLCO charges 0.39% per year while USMC charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $12 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JLCO currently yields 0.00% against 0.74% for USMC.

Holdings Overlap

JLCO already in USMC48.1%
USMC already in JLCO52.7%

48.1% of JLCO's money is in holdings USMC also owns. 52.7% of USMC's money is in holdings JLCO also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

12 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in JLCO and 27 in USMC, against full books of 108 and 58.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 15 positions for USMC that do not appear in our book for JLCO (47.2% of the fund), and 36 for JLCO that do not appear in USMC (45.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in JLCOWeight in USMCDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 377.94%5.55%2.39%
NVDANvidia Corp.5.22%7.99%2.77%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc Cap Stk Cl A6.84%5.33%1.51%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc6.13%3.77%2.36%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.88%7.18%5.30%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.47%4.44%0.03%
JPMJpmorgan Chase4.05%4.65%0.60%
COSTCostco Wholesale Corp.3.22%3.51%0.29%
BRK.BBrk/B2.63%3.07%0.44%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.62%2.28%0.34%

52.7% of USMC is already inside JLCO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

JLCOUSMC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JLCO or USMC?

JLCO has an expense ratio of 0.39% while USMC charges 0.12%. USMC is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between JLCO and USMC?

52.7% of USMC's money is in holdings JLCO also owns. 52.7% of USMC's is in holdings JLCO also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in JLCO and 27 in USMC.

Which pays a higher dividend, JLCO or USMC?

JLCO yields 0.00% while USMC yields 0.74%, so USMC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is USMC better than JLCO?

USMC has a lower expense ratio. JLCO is less concentrated, with 47.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.