JQUA vs VONE

JQUA vs VONE

Which is better, JQUA or VONE?

Nearly the same fund. VONE costs less.

VONE has a lower expense ratio. JQUA led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, VONE over 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. JQUA is less concentrated, with 19.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.9%.

Lower Fees: VONEHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: JQUA

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJQUAVONE
Expense Ratio0.12%0.06%Best
AUM$9.3B$8.9B
Dividend Yield1.08%1.02%
Holdings6241,027
YTD Return+19.98%Best+13.02%
1Y Return+21.86%Best+16.73%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.91%+22.11%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+13.77%Best+12.44%
Volatility (annualized)15.3%Best16.5%
Max Drawdown-32.9%Best-34.7%
$10,000 over 5 years$19,061Best$17,972
Top 10 Weight19.8%Best34.9%
Fund FamilyJ.P. Morgan Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 8, 2017Sep 20, 2010

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 9, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.9 years).

JQUA vs VONE growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.9 years both funds cover.

Compare JQUA against instead:JQUA vs SPYJQUA vs QQQJQUA vs VOOJQUA vs VTIVONE against:VONE vs VXUS

JQUA vs VONE Performance

JPMorgan US Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JQUA returned +21.86% while VONE returned +16.73%. Year to date, JQUA is up 19.98% versus a gain of 13.02% for VONE.

Over three years, JQUA compounded at +20.91% per year against +22.11% for VONE; over five years the annualized figures are +13.77% and +12.44% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, JQUA has the edge at +14.13% annualized vs +13.77%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VONE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.3% for JQUA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.9% for JQUA and -34.7% for VONE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JQUA charges 0.12% per year while VONE charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $6 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JQUA currently yields 1.08% against 1.02% for VONE.

Holdings Overlap

JQUA already in VONE97.6%
VONE already in JQUA57.7%

97.6% of JQUA's money is in holdings VONE also owns. 57.7% of VONE's money is in holdings JQUA also owns.

Most of JQUA is already inside VONE. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

295 positions in common, counted across the 306 positions we hold weights for in JQUA and 1,014 in VONE, against full books of 624 and 1,027.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 635 positions for VONE that do not appear in our book for JQUA (41.6% of the fund), and 4 for JQUA that do not appear in VONE (1.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in JQUAWeight in VONEDifference
NVDANvidia Corp2.00%7.26%5.26%
AAPLApple, Inc2.06%6.46%4.40%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp2.05%5.31%3.26%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc1.80%2.79%0.99%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.92%2.43%0.51%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.10%1.77%0.33%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.16%1.52%0.64%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc2.26%1.08%1.18%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity1.61%1.32%0.29%
XOMExxonmobil Corp.1.78%0.94%0.84%

97.6% of JQUA is already inside VONE.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

JQUAVONE

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JQUA or VONE?

JQUA has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VONE charges 0.06%. VONE is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, JQUA or VONE?

Over the past year JQUA returned +21.86% vs +16.73% for VONE, so JQUA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), JQUA annualized +14.13% vs +13.77% for VONE. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, JQUA or VONE?

VONE has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.3% for JQUA. Worst drawdown: JQUA -32.9% vs VONE -34.7%.

Should I hold both JQUA and VONE?

JQUA and VONE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between JQUA and VONE?

97.6% of JQUA's money is in holdings VONE also owns. 57.7% of VONE's is in holdings JQUA also owns. They hold 295 positions in common, counted across the 306 positions we hold weights for in JQUA and 1,014 in VONE.

Which pays a higher dividend, JQUA or VONE?

JQUA yields 1.08% while VONE yields 1.02%, so JQUA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VONE better than JQUA?

VONE has a lower expense ratio. JQUA led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, VONE over 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. JQUA is less concentrated, with 19.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.