JUDO vs QLTY
Janus Henderson US Equity Enhanced Income ETF vs GMO US Quality ETF
Which is better, JUDO or QLTY?
QLTY costs less.
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. JUDO is less concentrated, with 41.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JUDO | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $8M | $5.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.87% | 0.66% |
| Holdings | 128 | 90 |
| YTD Return | +13.22% | +15.19%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.45% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.21% |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.7%Best | 45.5% |
| Fund Family | Janus Henderson Investors | GMO |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 24, 2026 | Nov 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
JUDO vs QLTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
JUDO vs QLTY Performance
Janus Henderson US Equity Enhanced Income ETF (JUDO) is an ETF from Janus Henderson Investors and GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO. Year to date, JUDO is up 13.22% versus a gain of 15.19% for QLTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JUDO charges 0.55% per year while QLTY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $50 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JUDO currently yields 2.87% against 0.66% for QLTY.
Holdings Overlap
48.5% of JUDO's money is in holdings QLTY also owns. 62.5% of QLTY's money is in holdings JUDO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
22 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in JUDO and 45 in QLTY, against full books of 128 and 90.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 23 positions for QLTY that do not appear in our book for JUDO (37.2% of the fund), and 48 for JUDO that do not appear in QLTY (51.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JUDO | Weight in QLTY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.86% | 8.00% | 1.14% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.20% | 3.30% | 4.90% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.70% | 4.20% | 0.50% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.27% | 3.50% | 0.77% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.13% | 3.70% | 0.57% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.95% | 4.80% | 3.85% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.45% | 4.10% | 2.65% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.06% | 4.20% | 3.14% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.92% | 3.80% | 2.88% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.06% | 2.50% | 0.44% |
62.5% of QLTY is already inside JUDO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JUDO or QLTY?
JUDO has an expense ratio of 0.55% while QLTY charges 0.50%. QLTY is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between JUDO and QLTY?
62.5% of QLTY's money is in holdings JUDO also owns. 62.5% of QLTY's is in holdings JUDO also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in JUDO and 45 in QLTY.
Which pays a higher dividend, JUDO or QLTY?
JUDO yields 2.87% while QLTY yields 0.66%, so JUDO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLTY better than JUDO?
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. JUDO is less concentrated, with 41.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.