JUDO vs USMC

JUDO vs USMC

Which is better, JUDO or USMC?

USMC costs less.

USMC has a lower expense ratio. JUDO is less concentrated, with 41.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%.

Lower Fees: USMCLess Concentrated: JUDO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJUDOUSMC
Expense Ratio0.55%0.12%Best
AUM$8M$5.2B
Dividend Yield2.87%0.74%
Holdings12858
YTD Return+12.87%+13.98%Best
1Y Return-+14.91%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.22%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.81%
Top 10 Weight41.7%Best55.3%
Fund FamilyJanus Henderson InvestorsPrincipal Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 24, 2026Oct 11, 2017

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

JUDO vs USMC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare JUDO against instead:JUDO vs SPYJUDO vs QQQJUDO vs VOOJUDO vs VTIUSMC against:USMC vs VXUS

JUDO vs USMC Performance

Janus Henderson US Equity Enhanced Income ETF (JUDO) is an ETF from Janus Henderson Investors and Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is an ETF from Principal Funds. Year to date, JUDO is up 12.87% versus a gain of 13.98% for USMC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JUDO charges 0.55% per year while USMC charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $12 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JUDO currently yields 2.87% against 0.74% for USMC.

Holdings Overlap

JUDO already in USMC44.9%
USMC already in JUDO69.7%

44.9% of JUDO's money is in holdings USMC also owns. 69.7% of USMC's money is in holdings JUDO also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

16 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in JUDO and 27 in USMC, against full books of 128 and 58.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 11 positions for USMC that do not appear in our book for JUDO (30.2% of the fund), and 54 for JUDO that do not appear in USMC (55.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in JUDOWeight in USMCDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.8.20%7.99%0.21%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 376.86%5.55%1.31%
AAPLApple, Inc4.70%7.40%2.70%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.23%7.18%4.95%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.27%3.77%0.50%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.13%4.44%1.31%
JPMJpmorgan Chase2.28%4.65%2.37%
VVisa Inc-class A Shares1.67%4.54%2.87%
MAMastercard Inc1.56%4.32%2.76%
METAMeta Platform Inc0.95%3.92%2.97%

69.7% of USMC is already inside JUDO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

JUDOUSMC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JUDO or USMC?

JUDO has an expense ratio of 0.55% while USMC charges 0.12%. USMC is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between JUDO and USMC?

69.7% of USMC's money is in holdings JUDO also owns. 69.7% of USMC's is in holdings JUDO also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in JUDO and 27 in USMC.

Which pays a higher dividend, JUDO or USMC?

JUDO yields 2.87% while USMC yields 0.74%, so JUDO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is USMC better than JUDO?

USMC has a lower expense ratio. JUDO is less concentrated, with 41.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.